Also, a 1998 act in the California State Legislature authorized EBRPD to act for the state and use state funds to buy land for and operate the new Eastshore park. In 1998, with the state's finances recovering, voters approved two bond issues, one state and one regional, raising $40 million for purchasing land for the new Eastshore park. Its real estate subsidiary, Catellus Development Company, lost more court battles in the three cities before giving up in 1990. Santa Fe continued its strategy of promoting large-scale development projects along the shorelines of Emeryville, Berkeley, and Albany. Further progress on the park stopped when Republican George Deukmejian was elected Governor in 1983. Soon after the Supreme Court ruling, the California State Park and Recreation Commission put the shoreline park on its list of priority projects to fund and issued an official East Bay Shoreline Report recommending establishment of an East Bay shoreline park and identified key lands for inclusion. The Emeryville project became known by local people as "stilt city". A second setback had already occurred when the BCDC rejected Santa Fe's plan to build several high-rise buildings over wetlands in Emeryville. Santa Fe sued the city but lost the case in 1980, when the Supreme Court of California rejected the planned construction.
Santa Fe had a temporary setback in 1972, when the Berkeley City Council voted against allowing a proposed regional shopping center to be built atop a landfill. Furthermore, Santa Fe's owners felt certain that their property would become much more valuable if it remained in their hands.
EBRPD, which was already operating eight urban shoreline parks, thought Cal Parks should be the lead agency. However California State Parks, which had little experience managing urban land and little interest in the complicated challenges of this particular polluted parcel, showed no interest in taking on the property. BCDC backed the idea that the state park system should buy the land. In 1969 the state's Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) went from being an interim agency to a permanent state planning and regulatory entity. However, Save the Bay leaders soon realized that halting the dumping of material into the bay was a more urgent problem.
MCLAUGHLIN EASTSHORE STATE SEASHORE HOW TO
The newly formed association leaped into action, forming a shoreline park committee that began discussing how to raise funds for a small park in Berkeley in 1963. Sylvia McLaughlin, a local housewife turned environmental activist, was alarmed enough by the situation to recruit friends and associates to form the non-profit Save San Francisco Bay Association, later renamed as Save the Bay. The waterfront property, primarily owned by Catellus Development Corporation-a subsidiary of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway (Santa Fe for short)-was already worth many millions of dollars, and would be worth far more if developed with shopping centers and high-rise hotels. In particular, a 72-acre (29 ha) tract north of the Bay Bridge that extended between the cities of Emeryville and Richmond attracted the attention of commercial developers and environmental activists alike, though for different reasons. 1.1 Improvement projects funded in 2016ĭuring the 1960s, it became obvious that the East Shore of the San Francisco Bay was suffering from rapid commercial development and the accumulation of trash.
0 kommentar(er)
